Imports: Flexible metal tubing
U.S. imports of Flexible metal tubing decreased 1.02 percent through August to $232.25 million.
Top Sources
| Rank | Country | YTD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | China | $48.88 M |
| 2 | Mexico | $24.33 M |
| 3 | Israel | $21.43 M |
| 4 | South Korea | $19.86 M |
| 5 | India | $19.57 M |
| 6 | Canada | $14.5 M |
| 7 | Germany | $13.38 M |
| 8 | Vietnam | $13.14 M |
| 9 | Thailand | $13.1 M |
| 10 | United Kingdom | $7.24 M |
Top Gateways
| Rank | Port | YTD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Port of Los Angeles | $46.25 M |
| 2 | Port of Newark | $23.64 M |
| 3 | Port of Virginia | $19.66 M |
| 4 | Port of Houston | $19.17 M |
| 5 | Port of Long Beach | $14.83 M |
| 6 | Port Laredo | $7.91 M |
| 7 | Port of Savannah, GA | $7.8 M |
| 8 | Port of Charleston | $6.67 M |
| 9 | Otay Mesa Freeway Border Crossing, CA | $6.56 M |
| 10 | Pharr International Bridge in TX | $4.75 M |
Top markets Flexible metal tubing
Total:
Unavailable, check our plans to know more.
Flexible metal tubing by port
Total:
Unavailable, check our plans to know more.
U.S. imports of Flexible metal tubing decreased 1.02 percent through August to $232.25 million
The category ranked 612 through August among the roughly 1,265 import commodity groupings as classified by Census. It ranked No. 615 for the last full year with a total value of $352.61 million, a $13.1 million, 3.86 percent increase from the 2023 total.
Through August of this year the leading sources were No. 1 China, No. 2 Mexico, No. 3 Israel, No. 4 South Korea and No. 5 India. The leading sources were No. 1 Port of Los Angeles, No. 2 Port of Newark, No. 3 Port of Virginia, No. 4 Port of Houston and No. 5 Port of Long Beach.
In the last previous full year, the leading sources were No. 1 China, No. 2 South Korea, No. 3 Mexico, No. 4 Israel and No. 5 India. The leading sources were No. 1 Port of Los Angeles, No. 2 Port of Newark, No. 3 Port of Virginia, No. 4 Port of Houston and No. 5 Port of Long Beach.
Looking at specific airports, seaports and border crossings, the top five through the first eight months of the year were:
Highlights for the top five ports:
- Port of Los Angeles fell 6.35 percent compared to last year to $46.25 million.
- Port of Newark rose 18.66 percent compared to last year to $23.64 million.
- Port of Virginia fell 3.86 percent compared to last year to $19.66 million.
- Port of Houston rose 8.97 percent compared to last year to $19.17 million.
- Port of Long Beach rose 46.14 percent compared to last year to $14.83 million.
There are several hundred airports, seaports and border crossings that handle international trade; they are, in turn, part of the roughly four dozen U.S. Customs districts.
Highlights for the top five foreign sources:
- U.S. imports from No. 1 China decreased $6.59 million, 11.88 percent, (21.05 percent market share).
- U.S. imports from No. 2 Mexico increased $94,925, 0.39 percent, (10.48 percent market share).
- U.S. imports from No. 3 Israel increased $1.05 million, 5.17 percent, (9.23 percent market share).
- U.S. imports from No. 4 South Korea decreased $6.76 million, 25.38 percent, (8.55 percent market share).
- U.S. imports from No. 5 India increased $2.21 million, 12.72 percent, (8.42 percent market share).
All totaled, 57.73 percent of all these Flexible metal tubing imports to the United States were shipped from the top five sources through August of this year. That is equal to $134.07 million of the $232.25 million total.
All totaled, 53.2 percent of all these Flexible metal tubing imports to the United States were shipped to the top five Ports through August of this year. That is equal to $123.55 million of the $232.25 million total.