Imports: Carbides
U.S. imports of Carbides decreased 21.96 percent through August to $193.4 million.
Top Sources
| Rank | Country | YTD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | China | $85.33 M |
| 2 | Norway | $33.35 M |
| 3 | Austria | $15.41 M |
| 4 | South Africa | $10.3 M |
| 5 | Germany | $9.65 M |
| 6 | Canada | $8.38 M |
| 7 | Brazil | $7.85 M |
| 8 | Israel | $7.24 M |
| 9 | Taiwan | $5.1 M |
| 10 | Japan | $4.81 M |
Top Gateways
| Rank | Port | YTD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Port of Southern Louisiana | $40.52 M |
| 2 | Port of Virginia | $26.35 M |
| 3 | Port of Newark | $24.88 M |
| 4 | Port of Los Angeles | $18.11 M |
| 5 | Port of Baltimore, MD | $15.22 M |
| 6 | Port of Charleston | $7.75 M |
| 7 | Port Huron Blue Water Bridge, MI | $6.48 M |
| 8 | Port of Houston | $5.36 M |
| 9 | Port of Long Beach | $5.03 M |
| 10 | Port of Savannah, GA | $4.3 M |
Top markets Carbides
Total:
Unavailable, check our plans to know more.
Carbides by port
Total:
Unavailable, check our plans to know more.
U.S. imports of Carbides decreased 21.96 percent through August to $193.4 million
The category ranked 652 through August among the roughly 1,265 import commodity groupings as classified by Census. It ranked No. 620 for the last full year with a total value of $348.4 million, a $12.55 million, 3.48 percent decreased from the 2023 total.
Through August of this year the leading sources were No. 1 China, No. 2 Norway, No. 3 Austria, No. 4 South Africa and No. 5 Germany. The leading sources were No. 1 Port of Southern Louisiana, No. 2 Port of Virginia, No. 3 Port of Newark, No. 4 Port of Los Angeles and No. 5 Port of Baltimore, MD.
In the last previous full year, the leading sources were No. 1 China, No. 2 Norway, No. 3 South Africa, No. 4 Austria and No. 5 Taiwan. The leading sources were No. 1 Port of Southern Louisiana, No. 2 Port of Newark, No. 3 Port of Virginia, No. 4 Port of Baltimore, MD and No. 5 Port of Charleston.
Looking at specific airports, seaports and border crossings, the top five through the first eight months of the year were:
Highlights for the top five ports:
- Port of Southern Louisiana fell 5.55 percent compared to last year to $40.52 million.
- Port of Virginia rose 3.92 percent compared to last year to $26.35 million.
- Port of Newark fell 45.11 percent compared to last year to $24.88 million.
- Port of Los Angeles rose 80.94 percent compared to last year to $18.11 million.
- Port of Baltimore, MD fell 13.78 percent compared to last year to $15.22 million.
There are several hundred airports, seaports and border crossings that handle international trade; they are, in turn, part of the roughly four dozen U.S. Customs districts.
Highlights for the top five foreign sources:
- U.S. imports from No. 1 China decreased $17.17 million, 16.75 percent, (44.12 percent market share).
- U.S. imports from No. 2 Norway decreased $12.86 million, 27.83 percent, (17.25 percent market share).
- U.S. imports from No. 3 Austria decreased $4 million, 20.6 percent, (7.97 percent market share).
- U.S. imports from No. 4 South Africa decreased $15.04 million, 59.35 percent, (5.33 percent market share).
- U.S. imports from No. 5 Germany increased $686,362, 7.65 percent, (4.99 percent market share).
All totaled, 79.65 percent of all these Carbides imports to the United States were shipped from the top five sources through August of this year. That is equal to $154.05 million of the $193.4 million total.
All totaled, 64.67 percent of all these Carbides imports to the United States were shipped to the top five Ports through August of this year. That is equal to $125.07 million of the $193.4 million total.